Dec 14, 2011

रंगशालामा सलमान र प्रियंका!

,
 आयोजकहरुको योजनाले मूर्त रूप लिएमा नेपाली दर्शकले राजधानीको दशरथ रंगशालामा बलिउड हिरोहिरोइन सलमान खान र प्रियंका चोपडाको मादक नृत्य हेर्न पाउनेछन्। भारतको साईबाबा टेलिफिल्मस् र थटवेभ मिडियाले मंगलबार नेपाल पर्यटन बोर्डमा बलिउड कार्यक्रम गर्ने प्रस्तावना पेश गरेका हुन्। 
 
'अन्ताक्षरी', 'छोटे उस्ताद' र 'म्युजिक का महामुकाबला' जस्ता कार्यक्रम गरिसकेको यो समूहका तर्फबाट मंगलबार विलाश सालुंखे, धीरज रैना र छत्र भट्टको उपस्थिति थियो। समूहले प्रस्ताव राखेको परियोजनामा माधुरी दीक्षित, शाहिद कपुर, अर्जुन रामपाल, जोन अब्राहम, रितेश देशमुख, श्रेयस तेल्पडे, रणवीर सिंह, सोनाक्षी सिन्हा र बोमन इरानीजस्ता अभिनेताअभिनेत्रीको नाम पनि समावेश छ। 

कार्यक्रमलाई सांगीतिक बनाउन शंकर एहसान लोय र फरहान अख्तर तथा अलिशा चिनाई र श्रेया घोसललाई आयोजकले टिममा राखेको छ। नेपालको तर्फबाट सूरसुधा समूहको प्रस्तुति कार्यक्रममा हुनेछ।
सलमानलाई एक्रोबेटिक, प्रियंकालाई बलिउड गीतमा नेपाली शैलीको र शाहिदलाई माइकल ज्याक्सन डान्स पस्किन लगाउने आयोजकको योजना छ। 

नेपाललाई बलिउड कार्यक्रम आयोजना स्थलको रूपमा आकर्षित गर्न यो प्रोजेक्टमा सहकार्य गर्न लागेको पर्यटन बोर्डका वरिष्ठ निर्देशक सुभाष निरौलाले बताए। कार्यक्रमलाई सफल बनाउन बोर्डले सक्रिय भूमिका निर्वाह गर्नेछ।

नेपाल पर्यटन वर्षका संयोजक योगेन्द्र शाक्यले नयाँ दिल्लीमा हुन नसकेको ब्रायन एडम्सको कन्सर्टमा काठमाडौंमा भएकोले आयोजकलाई निर्धक्क हुन आग्रह गरे। भारतीय आयोजकलाइ आश्वस्त बनाउन कार्यक्रममा एसएसपी पूर्णसिंह खड्का र अध्यागमन विभागका महानिर्देशक सुधीरकुमार शाह पनि उपस्थित थिए। दुवैले आफ्नो तर्फबाट सहयोग गर्ने वचन दिए।

नेपाली निर्देशक तुलसी घिमिरे, नरेश पौडेल र नारायण पुरीले बलिउड र नेपालको सम्बन्धका बारेमा बोले। 
भारतीय समूहका तर्फबाट धीरज रैनाले काठमाडौंको मौसमअनुसार कार्यक्रमको मिति तोकिने बताए। उनका अनुसार चैत महिनामा कार्यक्रम हुने सम्भावना छ।

पूर्वाञ्चल विश्वविद्यालयका डिन अख्तियार हिरासतमा

,
 विश्वविद्यालय लानुपर्ने प्रवेश परीक्षाको उत्तरपुस्तिका विश्वविद्यालयका पदाधिकारी र कलेजका सञ्चालक मिलेर काठमाडौँको होटलमा जाँचेको उजुरी परेपछि  डिन रामकुमार सिंहलाई अख्तियारले आज नियन्त्रणमा लिएको छ। 
 
अख्तियार दुरुपयोग अनुसन्धान आयोगका प्रवक्ता ईश्वरीप्रसाद पौडेलले डिन सिंहलगायत शिक्षण सहायक नवीन भट्टराई र सह-प्राध्यापक मुक्तिनाथ भट्टराईलाई हिरासतमा राखेको जानकारी दिए।
शनिबार र आइतबार सो विश्वविद्यालयले लिएको हेल्थ साइन्स दोस्रो चरणको प्रवेश परीक्षा लिएको थियो। सोको उत्तर पुस्तिका काठमाडौँस्थित सम्पर्क कार्यालय लगेर त्यहाँबाट सीधै विश्वविद्यालयको विराटनगरस्थित केन्द्रीय कार्यालय लानु पर्ने थियो। तर हिजो काठमाडौँको गौशालास्थित होटल भिजनमा विद्यार्थीहरुले छरपस्ट अवस्थामा उत्तरपुस्तिका भेटाएपछि अख्तियारमा उजरी गरेका थिए।
उत्तरपुस्तिका होटलमा लगेर कलेज सञ्चालकहरुसँग बसेर जाँची घुस लिएर पास गर्न खोजेको उजुरी परेकोले त्यसमा छानबिन गर्न उनीहरुलाई नियन्त्रणमा लिइएको प्रवक्ता पौडेलले बताए।

Source Nagarik news

Dec 13, 2011

Biochemistry Amino Acid 1

,
By Indian Institute of Technology IIT khadak Pur:
Bio chemisty on lecture one

Mobile Web vs. Desktop Web

,

Fundamentally, there is one Web. Its content is standardized markup, styles, scripts, and multimedia viewable using web browsers. In this book, by convention, we call this the Web the Desktop Web. It is what we surf in Firefox or Opera or Internet Explorer on our desktops, laptops, and netbooks. The Web is a vast collection of servers linked by TCP/IP computer networks. Many of these servers, known as web servers, implement the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) to share documents and files. Web servers provide access by Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) to text files, markup documents, and binary resources.  
In an HTTP request, the client sends a web server the URI of the desired resource and a collection of request headers, one of which contains a list of MIME types that advertise 
the content types supported on the client. In an HTTP response, the web server sends the client the document itself (markup, text, or binary) and another set of headers, one of which contains the MIME type describing the file type of the document transmitted to the client. 
The Mobile Web uses the plumbing of the Desktop Web and adds new MIME types, markup languages, document formats, and best practices to provide web content optimized for the small screens, resource constraints, and usability challenges of web browsers on mobile devices.  The Mobile Web introduces new components into the web ecosystem, including: 
  Markup languages and styles optimized for mobile devices MIME types that differentiate mobile markup from desktop HTML Browser clients with a wide variety of capabilities 
  Network proxies that further adapt your content to cater for those clients If the Mobile Web is the Wild West, then the Desktop Web is an island paradise. The Desktop Web is a safe and well-understood development environment driven by client technologies steeped in established standards. At the time of this writing, the Desktop Web is nearly 20 years old. Desktop browser clients are public, free, freely available, and frequently updated. Only a handful of software vendors and open-source projects produce the dominant web browsers in use today, reducing the testing burden for cross-platform web development. In the desktop ecosystem, if a web page reaches the destination browser, its markup is almost always left unaltered en route by intermediary servers on the Internet. Network owners and Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are not interested in optimizing and improving the web experience through automated markup adaptation and content repackaging (see Table 1-1 for a list of the characteristics that define the Mobile Web and the Desktop Web).
Desktop Web filtering software can prevent viewing of objectionable web pages, but web filters work by blocking page access rather than adapting page syntax. Mobile Web development is a new discipline for these reasons:   The Mobile Web ecosystem is totally new. The Mobile Web uses the plumbing of the Desktop Web, but it has new best practices and new gotchas derived from the unique attributes of mobile devices. Desktop metaphors do not apply. Bandwidth consumption is a concern, even for smartphones. Rich Web 2.0 features such as JavaScript frameworks and Asynchronous JavaScript and XML (AJAX) must be used judiciously, or you risk draining battery power. 
Operators frequently control and block traffic to Mobile Web sites. Transcoding proxies often attempt to reformat mobile markup en route to a mobile browser. Finally, defensive programming is essential to reduce exposure to transcoders and mobile network problems. The Mobile Web user is totally new. Mobile Web users have unique usage patterns and navigation methods. Mobile users are keenly goal-directed and location-aware. Roaming in and out of coverage areas, mobile users count network access problems among the top 
factors affecting the Mobile Web browsing experience. In fact, cost-sensitive mobile users prefer to cancel the network transaction rather than risk a chargeable mistake. 
  The Mobile Web browser is totally new. The mobile browser has unique benefits, quirks, and workarounds. Partial and flawed implementations of web standards are commonplace. Improperly formatted web pages can have drastic effects on mobile devices, including crashing the browser or resetting the device. Advanced web features such as JavaScript and AJAX are highly desirable but drain battery life. With more than a dozen mobile browser vendors in the marketplace, the burden of ensuring compliance with web standards falls to OEMs and operators.

Mobile Web Development

,
Mobile is a totally new medium. Best practices from the desktop world simply do not 
apply. The unique attributes of the mobile device, ecosystem and user require new best 
practices for Mobile Web development. 
This book teaches you the syntax, semantics, and ecosystem of the Mobile Web. You 
will learn to build adaptive, responsive, and standards-compliant Mobile Web sites 
guaranteed to work on any mobile browser. Simple development tips and techniques 
will improve web usability on small screens. You will enrich your Mobile Web site for 
advanced smartphone browsers (browsers in high-end mobile phone with integrated 
Internet features such as email and desktop-capable Web browsing) capable of 
rendering full HTML and proprietary extensions. After development, you learn to test 
thoroughly on actual mobile devices, optimize Mobile Web pages for network transport, 
and maximize survival in the mobile ecosystem by avoiding transcoding. 
The Mobile Web is the Wild West. The big guns control the ecosystem, and shootouts 
are commonplace. A determined individual can stake a claim, build a homestead, and 
establish a community, and independent outposts flourish in remote locations. But the 
best way to survive is to show up armed. The most effective weapons for a mobile 
developer in the Wild West include: 
  deep technical understanding of mobile standards and best 
practices 
  critical thinking skills and a healthy sense of skepticism 
  fanatical devotion to syntactic correctness 
  an appreciation of the needs of mobile users 
A standards-based approach to Mobile Web development ensures compliance and 
usability across mobile browsers and platforms. Knowing all the rules—and knowing 
when to ignore the rules—is necessary for success on the Mobile Web.

airports In USA with airport code

,
1. Atlanta Hartsfield (ATL)
2. Austin (AUS)
3. Baltimore (BWI)
4. Bob Hope (BUR)
5. Boston (BOS)
6. Charlotte Douglas (CLT)
7. Chicago Midway (MDW)
8. Chicago OHare (ORD)
9. Cincinnati Aiport (CVG)
10. Cleveland (CLE)
11. Dallas Fort Worth (DFW)
12. Dallas Love (DAL)
13. Denver (DEN)
14. Detroit (DTW)
15. Ft Lauderdale (FLL)
16. Gunnison Airport (GUC)
17. Hartford Bradley (BDL)
18. Honolulu (HNL)
19. Houston Bush (IAH)
20. Houston Hobby (HOU)
21. Indianapolis Airp. (IND)
22. Jacksonville Airp.(JAX)
23. Kansas (MCI)
24. Las Vegas (LAS)
25. London Heathrow (LHR)
26. Long Beach (LGB)
27. Long Island (ISP)
28. Los Angeles (LAX)
29. Louisville Airport (SDF)
30. Memphis (MEM)
31. Mexico City Airp.(MEX)
32. Miami (MIA)
33. Milwaukee (MKE)
34. Minneapolis (MSP)
35. Nashville (BNA)
36. New Orleans (MSY)
37. New York JFK (JFK)
38. New York LaGuardia (LGA)
39. Newark (EWR)
40. Norfolk (ORF)
41. Oakland (OAK)
42. Oklahoma City (OKC)
43. Ontario (ONT)
44. Orlando (MCO)
45. Orlando Sanford Airport (SFB)
46. Palm Beach (PBI)
47. Paris Charles de Gaulle (CDG)
48. Paris Orly (ORY)
49. Philadelphia (PHL)
50. Phoenix (PHX)
51. PhxMesa Gateway (AZA)
52. Pittsburgh (PIT)
53. Portland (PDX)
54. Portsmouth (PSM)
55. Providence (PVD)
56. Raleigh Durham (RDU)
57. Rapid City (RAP)
58. Reno Tahoe Airport (RNO)
59. Sacramento (SMF)
60. Salt Lake City (SLC)
61. San Antonio (SAT)
62. San Diego (SAN)
63. San Francisco (SFO)
64. San Jose (SJC)
65. San Juan, PR (SJU)
66. Santa Barbara Airport (SBA)
67. Sarasota Bradenton (SRQ)
68. Seattle Tacoma (SEA)
69. St Louis Lambert (STL)
70. St Petersburg (PIE)
71. Steamboat Springs (HDN)
72. Tampa (TPA)
73. Toronto Pearson (YYZ)
74. Tucson (TUS)
75. Washington Dulles (IAD)
76. Washington National (DCA)
77. Westchester (HPN)
78. Wilmington (ILG)
79. Worcester (ORH)

soil fertility management

,

ABSTRACT

 

This study was conducted at three Village Development Committees of Myagdi district in 2011 to document the soil fertility management practices. Detail study was done at Babiachaur and Singha Village Development Committees (VDCs) with soil sample analysis. Forty farmers of selected VDCs were surveyed with semi structured interview schedule. In addition, key informant interview with field observation was carried out during this observation. Overall study revealed that application of farm yard manure (FYM) was the principle practice for maintaining soil fertility followed by use of chemical fertilizer (mainly urea and diammonium phosphate), inclusion of legumes and terracing. Insitu manuring was found only in Mudi VDC which lies comparatively higher altitude (Bagara Village up to 2300 masl). Farmers reporting on declining trend on soil fertility were confirmed from our finding of soil chemical analysis that in most cases soil was poor quality with low nutritional status and higher acidity.  

 

 

 

 

1. INTRODUCTION

 

1.1  Background

 

Nepal's economy largely depends on its agriculture sector. Sustaining soil fertility is essential for agricultural growth in Nepal. Farming in the mid-hills of Nepal is characterized by a close relationship between crop production, livestock and forestry, with trees and crops providing fodder and bedding materials for livestock, which in turn provide draft power and manure. Nowadays the linkage linkage between forests, livestock, and cropping systems is becoming weak. Soil fertility is largely maintained by the application of compost and manure, but in recent years a decline in soil fertility has been reported (e.g. Shrestha et al., 2000). Historical trends increasing crop intensification, decreasing livestock numbers, increasing use of chemical fertilisers, reduced labour availability, and change in the climate over the last 30-40 years) showed a decline in soil productivity (Desbiez, et. al., 2004).

Declining soil fertility has been considered one of the major problems in the hill and mountain areas of Nepal as a result of recent changes in agricultural practices and increasing resource constraints. Hartemink et al. (2008) cited in Bista et. al. (2010) documented several constrains in soil fertility management in Nepal because of deforestation and other land use changes. These changes include non-agricultural uses of fertile land, land fragmentation and cultivation in marginalized areas, cultivation on the slopes, overgrazing, burning of crop residues, imbalanced use of agrochemicals, and declining use of organic manure. In South and South-East Asia, the principal soil degradation processes associated with land use changes include accelerated erosion by water and wind, salinization, flooding, water logging, and soil fertility The pace of soil degradation issue is the highest in mountains because of the fragile environment and the steep slopes (Acharya and Kafle, 2009). Moreover, due to rugged mountainous topography, active tectonics and concentrated monsoon precipitation, Nepal is naturally highly vulnerable to soil erosion on slopes and flooding in the low-lands

 

Agriculture Perspective Plan (APP, 1995) put emphasis on boosting up the agriculture production through use of chemical fertilizers and irrigation in high production potential areas. Researchers have noted the emerging deficiencies of micronutrients especially zinc, boron and molybdenum and are increasing in extent in intensively cropped areas in different ecological belts of the country. Zinc has become a yield limiting in the major rice producing areas of the country. There is likewise a growing concern of the long-term impacts of fertilizer inadequacy and mismanagement in the rapid deterioration of soil health. The country's researchers have conducted a wide range of soil nutrient conserving activities that included management of acid soils, the adoption of sloping agricultural technologies, the use of biofertilizers.The national level of chemical fertilizer application rate is very low due to unavailability at right time, remoteness and poor purchasing power of Nepalese farmers. Generally, there is the indiscriminate use of chemical fertilizer. Farmers do not have sufficient knowledge about use of chemical fertilizer. 

 

The soil classification systems of the hill farmers of Nepal have already been documented (Tamang, 1991, 1992; Turton et al., 1995 cited in Dsbiez et. al. 2004), and these studies have shown that farmers use a range of criteria for soil classification among them; soil colour and texture are the dominant criteria. They also see the actual fertility of a soil at any time as a function not only of these longer-term soil properties, but also of the current and past management regime.

 

In Myagdi district 86 percent of the people are engaged in agriculture for their livelihood where crop and livestock farming is common (DADO, 2010). This district is highly mountainous district with geographical variation and rich in biodiversity. Soil management is very important for them. Thus this study is designed to assess the soil fertility management practices in Myagdi district. 

 

1.2  Rationale of the study

 

Soil fertility management is an important requirement for sustainable farming The Nepalese farming system is strongly interlinked among livestock, forestry and agriculture. The traditional agriculture is based on organic source of input and largely depends upon the forest resources and livestock raising practices for soil fertility management. Fertility status of soil can be increased by judicious application of both organic and inorganic fertilizers with other good soil management practices. Nowadays, the organic inputs are gradually being supplemented by inorganic sources especially in assessible area. However, chemical fertilizer application rate is very low in myagdi district specially due to remotenes and unavailability at right time as indicated by DADO Myagdi. Efforts have been made to develop research and development programmes both by government and non government institutions that would address the problems related to soil fertility, however, achievement is not upto the expected level. Keeping these points in view this study attempts to document the soil fertlility managemet practices in Myagdi district so that some concrete plan can be formulated to enhance improved practices of soil fertility management.

 

1.3  Objectives of the study

 

The broad objective of this study was to document the current practices of soil fertility management in Myagdi district with the following specific objectives

  • to identify farmers perception on soil fertility
  • to list down the soil futility management practice
  • to analyse the soil

 

 

2. METHODOLOGY

 

This study was carried out in Singha, Babiachaur and Mudi Village Development Committee of Myagdi district of Western development region. This district is highly mountainous district with geographical variation and rich in biodiversity. Geographical pattern of this district is structured by 8 percent plain valley, 58 percent hill and 36 percent Himalayan Mountain (DDC 2009). Myagdi river is a major river which flows west to east in the lower part. There are much variation in altitude and topography resulting climatic and soil variation. Singha, and Babiachaur lie on lower altitude whereas Mudi in higher altitute. Comparatively Babiachaur is more irrigated than Singha and Mudi as indicated by DADO Myagdi. Detail study was done in Singha and Babiachaur with field observation, soil analysis and household interview selecting 40 farmers. Information on farmers' perceptions on soil fertility and the indicators they use to assess the fertility status of their fields was gathered through individual semi-structured interview schedule. Topics covered included soil fertility management practices, local methods used to assess the fertility status of a field, and perceived trends in soil fertility. Whereas In Mudi only field observation and key informant survey were done. The relevant information was also collected through literature review. The data collected was analyzed using simple statistical tools.

 

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

 

3.1 Farmers' soil classification system

 

Based on their experience, the farmers in the study area have developed a local system of soil classification.  The farmers used the terms malilo and rukho for fertile and unfertile soils. The soil was classified according to recognizable and easily identifiable soil and field characteristics. Most of the farmers classified the soil according to its colour rather then texture. In their perception, black soil was highly valued for crop production as it contains organic matter and has high water holding capacity.

 

3.2 Farmers indicator of soil fertility

 

In our study area the farmers' indicators of soil fertility was yield, soil colour the topographic position of the field, and the stoniness. Farmers ranked these criteria in the following order: yield > topography > soil colour > stoniness (Figure 1). Yield was the most important criterion, and farmers are also aware that soil productivity is closely related to its position within the landscape.

   Figure: 1 Farmers indicator of soil fertility

3.3   Fertility management practices

 

The farmers in the study area were found using several soil and nutrient management activities, such as, use of farm yard manure (FYM), use of chemical fertilizer, inclusion of legume crops in cropping system and terracing. However, application of farmyard manure (FYM) and of chemical fertilizer were noticed principle practices for maintaining soil fertility in which combination of both was most common (figure 2). Shifting herds for in situ manuring was mainly found in Mudi VDC.

  Figure: 2 Fertility management practices.

 

 

 

 

3.3.1     Application of farm yard manure

 

 Animal manure is the main source of soil fertility in upland hills in Nepal (Suresh et.al.1999). In the study area there was the well integration of crop and livestock in which in which livestock provides FYM to crops.  Quality and amount of animal manure is importance to enhance soil fertility. Most of the farmers reported that they used well decomposed manure in the field.  They perceived that partially decomposed manure does not mix well with soil. It also increases infestation by insect pests. Again fast decomposing crop residues also influence soil fertility. The amount of FYM used in crop varied according to crop and field status. Generally in irrigated and partially irrigated area maize is followed by rice and the farmers practice was application of FYM only in maize. In the wheat growing area, they used FYM during field preparation. In vegetable all the respondents used FYM.

 

3.3.2 Farm yard manure preservation and application time in the field

 

The improved heap or pit method of FYM preparation, along with improved cattle sheds made by farmers helped reducing the nutrient loss from manure pits, which better supported the growth of the corps. The time of organic manure application and the method of its preservation in manure pits play an important role in its nutrient availability. Leaving the manure for long time in small heaps facilitates the loss of nutrients either by volatilization or leaching. Most of the farmers in the study area followed the traditional method of manure piling in open piles rather than improved cattle shed with manure pit (Figure. 3). A study conducted by Bista et.al. (2009) on assessment of soil fertility management practice in Nuwakot and Chitwan found that more than 55 percent of the Nuwakot farmers followed that practice, which allowed maximum loss of nutrients from manure heaps either by sun or leaching by heavy down power in early monsoon.  Chitwan farmers were more aware of these negative consequences of early manure application in the field and only 21.5 percent of them followed that practice, not knowing the negative effects. Knowledgeable farmers followed the application of manure at the time of planting and incorporated it in soil, which was common in Chitwan (78.5 percent).  In our study also the most of the farmers (fig 3) were more aware of these negative impact of manure application prior of field preparation as they apply FYM just before field preparation. 15 years back they applied FYM about one month prior to field preparation and seed sowing. When asked about their familiarity, they reported that they were familiarized it by District Agriculture Development Office (DADO) and Agriculture Service Centre (ASC) as they are located in assessable area.

 

  Figure: 3 FYM preservation methods

 

3.3.3     Application of chemical fertilizer

 

The important soil fertility management practice in the study area was use of FYM followed by chemical fertilizer. Most of the farmers in the study area used chemical fertilizer along with FYM rather than their sole use. The commonly used fertilizers were Urea, Diammonium Phosphate (DAP) and Muriate of Potash (MOP). However, some commercial farmers used micronutrients like multiplex. Basically, they used chemical fertilizer on maize at knee height stage. All the farmers mentioned that they did not apply the recommended dose of chemical fertilizer as they used their own judgment. Mostly they used urea in maize and wheat but not rice. It is to note down that there is the transportation subsidy in chemical fertilizers in Myagdi district for few years.

 

3.3.4     Inclusion of legumes

 

Leguminous crops can play an important role to maintain soil fertility and sustain crop production. Legumes are an important source of nutrition to both humans and livestock by providing the much needed protein, minerals, fiber and vitamins. Cultivation of legumes is essential for the regeneration of nutrient-deficient soils. Legumes can be incorporated into cropping systems as green manure, intercropped or rotated with cereals and as leguminous shrubs in improved fallow systems. By biologically fixing nitrogen (BNF) in the soil, legumes provide a relatively low-cost alternative of expensive inorganic nitrogen in the soil. Legumes also improve other soil physical properties, provide ground cover and reduce soil erosion, increase soil organic matter. In the study area inclusion of legumes was the common practice in which local bean namely Bhatte simi, Gahate simi, Sarade simi and chirkimirke simi were intercropped with maize. Pea intercropped with wheat was also common practice as observed in the field. The farmers incorporated the crop residue specially stems and roots in the soil to maintain soil fertility. Soybean intercropping was also common in the bunds of rice field.

3.3.5 In-situ manuring

In-situ manuring is a traditional way to maintain soil fertility.  In-situ manuring, the manuring of fields by tethering the animals directly in the fields, is an important strategy developed by farmers. This practice was common in Mudi VDC as seen in the field where manuring of agriculture field was done by folcking the animal in the field at night and allowing them to graize in the forest during the day.  In our transact walk in Mudi. it was observed that Animals are moved from one peg to another every 2-3 nights so as to competely manure the field. Specially it is done in April after the wheat or barley harvest, and before maize or millet planting. In Bagara of Mudi, rotational grazing of buffalo in forest was very common practice which is less labour intensive practice. However, loss of manure and urine occurs in this practice.

3.4 Farmers perception on soil fertility

All the respondents in the study area showed the positive response on the use of FYM to increase the fertility status of soil. It was found that there was the decreasing trend of livestock raising due to insufficient labour and grazing land. It has resulted the decreasing trend of application rate of FYM for 10 years. The study revealed that most of the farmers have increased the application rate of chemical fertilizer due to its accessibility whereas decreased the use of FYM during last 10 years. However, most farmers believed that their land was less fertile and more compact than 10 years back.

 

3.5 Response of farmers towards the use of   chemical fertilizer

 

Many farmers in the study area felt that the continuous application of chemical fertilizer was causing the soil deterioration resulting the decrease in crop productivity specially millet and legumes. According to them there were no alternatives as soil demands chemical fertilizers.

 

3.6 Soil sampling and analysis

 

Soil testing plays an important role in nutrient management and crop production. It tells key nutrient levels, as well as pH levels of the soil. Soil testing mainly involves three-step process: the collection of a representative sample from each field or section, proper analysis of that sample to determine the levels of available nutrients, and use of the results to determine optimum fertilizer rates. Soil testing program was oragnized in Singha and Babiachaur where 208 soil samples from 6 VDCs were analysed. Among them 115 samples were from Babiachaur and Singha. From this analysis it was found that, soil was acidic in nature having low nutritional status in most cases (figure.4, 5, 6, 7). In many cases, farmers' reporting on decreasing trend of soil fertility were confirmed findings from soil analysis. The reason might be the increase crop intensification as 30 years ago only rice was grown on low land and maize-millet on upland and decreasing trend of FYM use. Now there are three crops on lowland (rice, maize and wheat) and three crops on upland (maize, millet, wheat).

 

   Figue 4. PH status of soil

 

 

Figue 5. Nitrogen status of soil

  Figue .6 Phosphorous status of soil

 

Figue 7. Potash status of soil

 

 

 

4. CONCLUSION

 

Soil is fundamental to all agricultural systems. The agriculture production and productivity are mainly determined by the soil management. The finding showed that the principle practice for maintaining soil fertility was application of FYM, however, its use was found in decreasing trend due to decrease in livestock number resulted from shortage of labour and grazing land.   Farmers reporting on declining trend on soil fertility were confirmed from our finding of soil chemical analysis that in most cases soil was poor quality with low nutritional status and higher acidity.  Based on this research it has been concluded that integrated nutrient management approach focusing on FYM application and balanced use of chemical fertilizer to improve the soil fertility would be sustainable approach.

 

 

 

 

REFERENCES

 

Acharya A.K. and N. Kafle. 2009. Land Degradation Issues in Nepal and its Management Through Agro-forestry. The Journal of Agriculture and Environment, 10, p 115-123.

 

Bista, P., R. Ghimire., S.C. Sah, K.R. Pandey. 2010. Assessment of Soil Fertility Management Practices and Their Constraints in Different Geographic Locations of Nepal. http://uwyo.academia.edu/RajanGhimire/Papers/

 

Desbiez,A., R.Matthews., B. Tripathi and J. Ellis-Jones. 2004. Perceptions and Assessment of Soil Fertility by Farmers in the Mid-hills of Nepal. http://www.nrsp.org/database/documents/1004.pdf

 

Hartemink A. E., T. Veldkamp, Z. Bai 2008. Land Cover Change and Soil Fertility Decline in Tropical Regions. Turk. J. Agric, 32, 195-213.

 

Shrestha B., S.L. Maskey., R.K. Shrestha., B.P. Tripathi., Y.J. Khadga., R.C. Munankarmy., E.M. Bhattarai and S.P. Shrestha. (2000), Soil Fertility Management: Farmers Practices and Perceptions in the Hills of Nepal, Lumle Technical Paper No. 2000/4. Lumle (Nepal): LARC. 

Organic Farm Proposal

,

Table of Contents

 

 


1. Executive Summary

 

2. Introduction

 

3. Proposal

Establishment of Farm

·          Resources

·          Site

·          Farm Advisory Board

·          Board of Trustees

·          Labor

·          Materials/Equipment

 

Educational Programs

·          Academic Programs

·          Recreational Programs

·          Community Outreach

 

 Food Production

                        ·          Planting and Harvesting

                        ·          Production

 

Waste Recycling

            ·          Composting

 

Build Model of Sustainability

            ·          Promotion

 

4. Appendix

1)      Farm Advisory Board

2)      Resources

3)      Suggested Timeline

4)      Farm Management Plan

Guidelines, Border, Greenhouses, Crop Rotation,

Fertility Management, Harvesting, Pest Management

5)      Budget

6)      Site Reviews

7)      Collegiate Organic Farm Research

 

 

 

 

 

Proposal for the Establishment of a Yale Organic Farm

Executive Summary:

 

We propose the establishment of a Yale Organic Farm on at least 1 acre in close proximity to the Yale campus. The farm will include facilities for four-season vegetable production, institutional composting, and indoor storage.

 

·                     Objectives:

1)      To provide a valuable educational resource to Yale students, faculty, and staff;

2)      To model the most economically, socially, and ecologically sustainable farming practices available to us, while preserving an integral part of the landscape and the local economy;

3)      To serve as a resource and link to the greater New Haven community.

4)      To provide members of the Yale community with locally and sustainably produced food of the highest quality imaginable;

5)      To teach students in the dining halls, by serving food grown on the farm, perhaps even harvested by the students themselves, that eating is an agricultural act;

6)      To provide Yale students, faculty, and staff with the opportunities to work on a farm and to learn the skills needed to produce food, experiencing its joys and challenges;

7)      To compost Yale's organic waste, therefore reducing the University's disposal costs and creating a source of fertility for the Yale farm and other local farms;

8)      To make Yale a model of urban organic agriculture and food system sustainability.

 

·                     Educational Programs:

1)      The farm will be incorporated in the curricula of courses in Yale College.

2)      Work-shops for Yale and New Haven community members will be held at

the farm.

3)      Yale students will participate in farm work, both as volunteers and through a summer internship program.

4)      The farm will provide innovative educational programs for New Haven children.

 

·                     Timeline for Establishment of the Farm:

1)      Selection of an appropriate site by the Farm Advisory Committee in conjunction with Yale administrators;

2)      Creation of a Board of Trustees to oversee planning and funding;

3)      Hiring of a farm manager;

4)      Acquisition of appropriate tools and materials;

5)      Tilling and planting begins.

 

 

 

 

Introduction

 

"…eating is an agricultural act."                     -Wendell Berry

 

"To forget how to dig the earth and tend the soil is to forget ourselves."     -Gandhi

 

            We all eat. We eat at the dinner table with our families, in the dining hall with our academic community, in restaurants, in the car, at the computer, in front of the TV, and on the phone. We eat Caesar salad, bagels and cream cheese, hamburgers, pesto pasta, chicken wings, and coffee ice cream.  Although we have a vast array of foods available to us nearly all the time, we rarely stop to ponder where our food comes from, and the complex consequences resulting from the choices we make when we eat it. 

            When we look at a plate of food, we don't think about the thousands of miles it probably traveled to reach us.  We don't think about the energy (probably fossil fuels emitting green-house gases) consumed in its transportation, or in its harvesting, processing, refrigeration, and packaging.  We don't think about the chemicals and carcinogenic pesticides sprayed on the fields where our food was grown.  Nor do we think about all the people and jobs involved from start to finish.  Though it may not be obvious to the majority of people, eating a banana may contribute to global warming, a rise in the incidence of cancer, and the exploitation of the working class in Guatemala.  In this rapidly dynamic world, it is of ultimate importance to think about the web of food production.  

            At Yale, students can find classes ranging from German philosophy to complex mathematics to Queer Studies.  Some classes relevant to agriculture, such as soil science, plant biology, the history of agriculture and, most notably, the offerings of the Agrarian Studies program, do exist. Nowhere, however, is there a space or forum for one to simply learn how to grow one's own food.  And, more importantly, students are given little encouragement to think critically about the way we as humans connect to and draw sustenance from our land through agriculture.  A Yale farm would serve this purpose.

            In a predominantly and increasingly urban world, we are losing the vital connection between humans and land, and along with it, simple joys—like the warmth of sun on one's back and the earth under one's bare feet, watching a plant grow over several months, and sensing a profound power in the creation of life, sustenance, and interconnectedness.  There are deep lessons and pleasures that cannot be taught or conveyed in a classroom or in a textbook—they must be experienced firsthand.  That is why the creation of a Yale farm is imperative.

 

New England has a rich agricultural history, dating back prior to European settlement. Yet, as the New Haven urban landscape grows in size, the number of working farms around the area is in steep decline. Although a farm may seem entirely new to Yale, the university was actually Connecticut's original Land Grant College. Thus, a Yale farm will recapture a piece of Yale's history. The creation of a Yale farm will also link other ongoing initiatives at Yale, such as the Sustainable Food Initiative at Berkeley, the institutional composting program, the ACEM initiative for the greening of the Yale campus, a successful farming conference that occurred in the spring of 2002 at Yale, and twelve years of the Agrarian Studies program with weekly colloquia. There are many other colleges in New England and the greater United States that have organic farms tied to their academic programs, and these will serve as useful models for the Yale farm. The development of a Yale farm will also be truly unique, as no other university has an organic farm, within an urban environment, that comprises an integral part of their food system. In an urban environment, where the link to the natural environment and agriculture is often the farthest removed, Yale will have an opportunity to act as a leader through the establishment of an effective model of sustainable urban agriculture.

 

 

 


1. Establishment of the Farm

            Preliminary Requirements:

 

¨ Resources

            There are many people and organizations that will be valuable resources for the development of a Yale Farm. Contacts have been made with several independent local organic farmers around New England who are willing to offer advice about small-scale farming. Scientists at the Connecticut Agricultural station (Appendix 2) in New Haven are also interested in working with the Yale farm on organic pest management and issues of compost application. Yale faculty members have also expressed interest in helping to set up the farm program and utilize it as a resource for their classes. Other collegiate organic farms (Appendix 7) have been researched and evaluated so that their experiences can guide the Yale farm.

 

¨ Site

In choosing a site for the Yale Farm, one of the major criteria for the land will be its proximity to the Yale campus—the closer the better, as a more accessible location will involve more students. Size is another important factor. The minimum amount of land required for the farm is an acre, while the ideal spot would be 15 acres. Since proximity to the campus is important, if only a small plot was available near the university, a larger plot may be acquired outside of New Haven for larger-scale production once the smaller farm has been well established. In order to ensure active student participation, the small plot near the university will be maintained as the visible face and organizational center of the farm. All the Yale land holdings near New Haven will be evaluated first to void significant purchasing fees. Yale alumni will also be solicited for land donations. The land quality will also be a determining factor in site selection; all the potential sites will be evaluated in terms of soil quality, sunlight, grade, water quality/availability, flood history and abutting land uses. Taking all these considerations into account, the Farm advisory board will select the most appropriate site (Appendix 6) for the Yale farm.

 

¨ Farm Advisory Board

            Faculty and students have been chosen to advise the university about the initial formation of the farm (Appendix 1). Members have been selected based on their knowledge and interest in agrarian and environmental issues. Once the administration approves the proposal, the board will select the site for the farm and guide the farm through its initial construction. After the creation of the farm, the Advisory Board will be folded into the Board of Trustees.

 

¨ Board of Trustees

A Board of Trustees will be selected to set policy, produce strategic plans and monitor the farm's long-term progress. This board will have a broader range of members than the Farm Advisory Board in order to ensure that the farm will have close ties to all of the organizations and departments connected to the farm. It will be comprised of an academic advisor(s), a Yale administration officer(s), a business manager, a farm manager, student coordinator(s), dining hall representative(s), local farmer(s), and coordinators of educational programs that are working with the farm. The goal of the board will be to bring an interdisciplinary and interdepartmental perspective to decision making on the farm.

 

¨ Staff

The hired staff members will be responsible for the daily operations and maintenance of the farm and composting facility. A farm manager will be a full-time employee responsible for the crops and the composting facility. Due to the large number of students that will visit the farm, it is also important that the farm manager be a skilled teacher with interpersonal skills. A farm coordinator will be responsible for the administrative requirements and coordination of all education programs offered to both the Yale and New Haven communities. The bulk of the labor on the farm will be provided voluntarily by students and through a work-study program. During the summer, the farm will have a paid internship program offered to interested and qualified students.

 

¨ Materials/Equipment

The farm's material requirements will depend on its size and location. The most general inventory of supplies will include garden tools, a tractor (potentially fueled with bio-diesel, derived from dining hall waste), and seasonally purchased seeds, that will all be housed in a small storage shed on site. The farm will also include several low-cost greenhouses. Because there is such a wide variety of composting units that are suited for different locations, the best composting method will be chosen from a number of options after the specific site has been selected. The environmental sustainability of the farm will be emphasized through the green design of all buildings and the use of alternative energy sources. (Appendix 5)

 

2. Educational Programs

More than a mere food production center, the farm will enhance the educational and recreational opportunities of Yale students, and serve as a vital link to the New Haven community.

 

¨ Academic Programs

With the cooperation of the School of Forestry and Environmental Studies and interested undergraduate professors, the farm will serve as Yale's outdoor classroom, providing opportunities for research, scholarship, and hands-on learning in various academic disciplines. As a living ecosystem, the farm will be useful for the study of ecology. Also, it will serve as an outdoor scientific laboratory for research in plant and soil science. As a model of sustainable agricultural production and resource use, the farm will become a valuable learning center for students in environmental and agrarian studies and environmental engineering. As a micro-enterprise, the farm will be an excellent research subject for studies in economics and management. And following the popular axiom, 'Think globally, act locally,' the farm will enhance the study of globalization by demonstrating first-hand to students the fundamental challenges the human population faces in its struggle to survive off the land.

Several other academic departments will also benefit from the presence of the farm in more indirect ways. Students of anthropology will explore the cultural underpinnings of farming practices; historians will consider the long trajectory, extending back hundreds of years, of human engagement with New England's soil; psychologists will look at what happens in the mind when we connect with our food in a meaningful way; artists will find a beautiful and inviting outdoor studio; and philosophers and English majors will be able to follow Thoreau and contemplate the human relationship with nature. Finally, beyond these academic disciplines, all who come to the farm will leave with a better understanding of the philosophy and techniques of farming.

 

¨ Recreational Opportunities

In a poll conducted last year by the YCC, 370 students indicated that they would enjoy working on the Yale farm, and anyone who has worked the land knows that such work, though often grueling, can be extremely rewarding. Volunteers will be welcomed.  The farm work will also be incorporated into Yale's work-study program, and several full-time interns will be given a modest stipend to work the farm during the summer months. Student groups like the Yale Student Environmental Coalition, Yale Outdoors, and Harvest will organize workdays and educational programs at the farm on weekends, and the farm will be open for festivals, picnics, and outdoor performances, making it an integral part of the Yale campus.

 

¨ Community Outreach

The farm will be an educational and recreational resource for the wider New Haven community as well, fostering constructive interaction between Yale and the city. Local elementary schools, as well as schools for children with special needs, will take field trips to the farm to learn about farming and participate in growing and harvesting activities. Also, a summer day-camp will offer children both an exciting way to learn about nature and where food comes from, as well as an opportunity to care for animals. On certain occasions, a small amount of the farm's produce will also be given to local public schools in order to provide healthy, enjoyable snacks for children. Moreover, through programs like Head Start and LEAP, Yale students interested in community service work will be able to bring local youth to the farm so they can experience a green space, learn about healthy living, and try their hands at growing and preparing food. Beyond the school system, local farmers will host workshops to teach local gardeners about ecological farming methods and to educate the community about the importance of a local, sustainable food system. Also, a few raised garden beds will be built to enable elderly community members to engage in gardening. All of these programs will provide meaningful volunteer opportunities for Yale students and create real benefits for the New Haven community

 

3.  Food Production

 

¨ Planting and Harvesting

These goals call for a management plan that, rather than solely maximizing production, strives to maximize system health and educational viability. Long-term, sustainable heavy yields can only be the result of a healthy system.  This calls for a method of managing soil fertility that addresses the notion of fertility, not as "plant food," but as the byproduct of a system well managed, through crop rotations, mulching, reduced tillage, and undersowing of green manures.  By managing fertility in this way, the Yale Farm will not only produce healthy, nutritious, tasty and beautiful food, it will model how the production can occur, while enhancing, rather than destroying, the health of the local ecology. Pest management will also be seen as a byproduct of a system well managed.  Ideally, pests are managed by growing healthy plants in healthy soil, amidst a diverse ecosystem.  A system of inexpensive, energy efficient mobile greenhouses allows for winter production, while leaving room for diverse crop rotations.  Hand harvesting and speedy delivery will allow us to grow crop varieties notable for flavor, rather than for mechanized harvest, ability to be shipped, and long shelf-life.  Once the farm is well established, there will be the potential to increase the diversity of food produced by introducing animals for meat, dairy, and eggs into the farm's system.  The abundance of compost afforded by the composting of Yale's organic waste will allow the Yale Farm to supply compost to local community gardens, and will create a fertile environment for Yale students and New Haven residents to interact both in the summer months and during the school year.  The waste from dining halls that is currently being flushed into our water system will instead be used as a source of fertility that will grow healthy produce to be served in those same dining halls. (Appendix 4)

 

¨ Production

The Yale Farm will be managed to provide members of the Yale community with diverse, locally and sustainably produced food, of the highest quality imaginable. Simultaneously, it will provide Yale students, faculty and staff with the opportunity to work on a farm, to learn the joys and challenges of food production, and to learn the skills needed to produce food.  By serving food grown on the farm in the dining halls, perhaps food that those dining had harvested themselves, the farm will help students to see that eating is an agricultural act. 

Interested and motivated Yale students will also be granted their own plots, where they could take on the responsibility of growing their own garden.  While Yale is not in session, the farm will serve as a resource to the greater New Haven community. Throughout the year, it will serve as a model of the most economically, socially, and ecologically sustainable farming practices available to us. (Appendix 4)

 

 

 

 

4. Waste Recycling

 

¨ Compost

Presently Yale grinds and flushes over 150 tons of food waste per year into the sewer system.  The New Haven Water Pollution Control Authority fines Yale with a surcharge that totals over $140,000 per year.  As Bill Idarola of the Water Pollution Control Authority stated, "Yale University is the center of higher education in Connecticut.  They are also the center of water pollution stemming from institutional kitchens." The Water Pollution Control Authority says that this surcharge may double over the next two years.  Yale also hauls over 120 tons of food waste to the incinerator in Wallingford.  We send over 500 tons of laboratory bedding waste to the incinerator in Bridgeport and 65 tons of fall leaves are sent to a composting facility in West Haven.  Yale pays to haul this waste, it pays to dump it, and in the case of the food waste sent down the drain, it pays a fine for polluting with it.

 

At present, New Haven is home to 60 community gardens.  All of them are experiencing a compost shortage.  In addition, New Haven's industrial heritage leaves the city's soil heavily contaminated with lead and other heavy metals; the most effective remedy for lead contamination is compost application.  New Haven is in desperate need of composted organic matter.  As stated above, Yale currently pays greatly to dispose of its organic waste, and we accomplish that disposal in an ecologically unsound manner.  With relative ease, Yale can compost its organic waste at the Yale farm, supply the community and the farm with much needed compost, and save over 100,000 dollars a year.

 

Preferred composting practices vary with site characteristics.  Generally speaking, the best method for composting organic waste in urban areas is the use of an In-Vessel Composter.  These machines (essentially a truck container with a moving floor and augers) speed up the composting process, guarantee no odor, and have a small footprint.  They require a greater capital commitment, but they tend to save money in labor, space and hauling (as they allow composting to take place closer to the pickup site).  In more remote areas, where space is at less of a premium, and where residential homes do not abut the composting site, actively aerated static piles are the preferred method.  These piles are built around inexpensive perforated tubing, through which air is forced, to guarantee aerobic decomposition (aerobic decomposition avoids odor problems, and decreases the time necessary for effective composting).  Actively aerated static piles require less capital outlay, but call for more space, and a less densely populated area. 

 

Yale's present waste disposal practices pose an ecologically and economically expensive problem.  Yale can solve this problem and help the New Haven Community at the same time, through treating that organic matter not as waste, but as a valuable resource.

 

 

 

 

5. Build Model of Sustainability

 

            With an exploding world population, the degradation of agricultural land, and a rise in environmental toxins, sustainable and organic agriculture is quickly becoming a hot issue with international focus.  People are demanding food that is safe and healthy both for their bodies and for the environment.  With the recent transition of the majority of the world's population to cities instead of rural areas, urban agriculture has gained new importance.  Furthermore, urbanization has led to a disconnection between humans and the land, from which we draw everything we use to survive.  By recognizing this vital connection between people and earth, as well as the creative role humans play in life cycles, Yale has the opportunity to restore and further develop these relationships on a micro-scale.

Food systems, like forests, are complex ecosystems, and their study is of great importance.  Organic agricultural systems are unique ecosystems. Unlike large-scale, chemical-ridden monocropping, organic systems elevate environmental health—by harmonizing with ecologic and biologic cycles, promoting biodiversity, and eliminating polluting chemicals. This, in turn, leads to cleaner water supplies and building nutrient-rich soil.  Goals in studying organic agroecology are wholly in line with the mission statement of the Forestry school, which reads, "[w]e create new knowledge in the science of sustainability and new methods of applying that knowledge to the challenge of environmental management, the restoration of degraded environments, and the pursuit of sustainable development."

At Yale, an Ivy League school wielding momentous influence, a farm will serve as a powerful model of sustainable resource production, utilization, and preservation—sending an ethical message to the world.

 

¨ Promotion

The farm is a great opportunity for positive Yale publicity.  In order to make the farm a visible example for other institutions to follow, emphasis will be placed on publicizing the values, history, and successes of the farm.  Within the Yale community, the farm will be shared through the courses which incorporate it into their curricula and the students who participate in its programs.  Outside of the Yale community, news of the farm will be spread through articles in the journals and newspapers, talks given at other schools, and participation in agricultural conferences. As such, the farm will simultaneously serve as an integral component of the Yale food system and set the stage for further change at other institutions.

 

 


 Sponsors

           

Faculty

                        James Axley, School of Architecture

                        Diana Balmori, School of Architecture

                        Kelly Brownell, Psychology

                        Kathryn Dudley, American Studies, Anthropology

                        Gordon Geballe, Associate Dean, Forestry and Environmental Studies

Mary Helen Goldsmith, MCDB, School of Forestry and Env. Studies

                        Stephen Kellert, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies

                        Daniel Kevles, History

                        Susan Mayne, School of Public Health

                        John Rogers, Master of Berkeley College

James Scott, Political Science, anthropology, School of Forestry and

Environmental Studies, Director of Agrarian Studies

                        Gus Speth, Dean of the School of Forestry and Environmental Studies

                        Steven Stoll, Environmental Studies, History, American Studies

                        John Wargo, DUS, Environmental Studies

                        Harvey Weiss, Anthropology, Near Eastern Lang/Civ, Env. Studies

                       

Farmers

                        Bill Duesing, Director of NOFA-CT, Yale College class of '64

                        George Purtill, Old Maid's Farm, South Glastonbury, CT

                        Kim Stoner, Connecticut Department of Agriculture, New Haven

Agricultural Experiment Station, Hamden, CT

                        Northeast Organic Farming Association of CT Board of

Directors (NOFA-CT)

 

            Community Members

                        Silvia Dorsey, Manager of New Haven Community Gardens

 

            University Groups

                        The Yale Sustainable Food Project

Yale Dining Hall Service

                        Yale Student Environmental Coalition (YSEC)

                        Food From the Earth (FFE)

                        The Harvest Program

Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies Student Food

Interest Group (Food SIG)

 

            Etc.

                        Alice Waters

                        Michael Poland

                        Carol Shennan, director of Agroecology program at UC Santa Cruz

 

Online Post Copyright © 2011 | Template design by Mero Post | Powered by Blogger